<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Californication</title>
	<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on television writing for screenwriters</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: CAROLINE</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-53</link>
		<author>CAROLINE</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Would it be odd to say that I admire the craft of it but that it leaves me cold?  Kind of like Anthony Minghella movies.   He's technically genius but somehow bereft of what I feel is honest and unmanipulated emotion.  I feel like I will keep watching but probably won't enjoy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be odd to say that I admire the craft of it but that it leaves me cold?  Kind of like Anthony Minghella movies.   He&#8217;s technically genius but somehow bereft of what I feel is honest and unmanipulated emotion.  I feel like I will keep watching but probably won&#8217;t enjoy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-52</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I had no plans on watching this show, but the fact that you did a breakdown on it,  and that Denis over at Dead Things on Sticks said it was good, convinced me to give it a shot.   I wish I hadn't.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The show seemed wish fulfillment writ large to me.  The writer peeved about a movie adaptation; been there.  Beautiful women throwing themselves at him; seen that.  A single novel (apparently) having made a fellow rich, respected, and loved; imagined that in my darker moments.  Oh, the novelist is a tough guy and beats up "hispanic cell phone guy" in a theater too; be still my Chuck Norris loving heart.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;All taken together I'm left with the impression I'm reading some weird variety of Salman Rushdie fan fic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Since it's only a half hour set up I'm trying to hold some goodwill for the show in reserve.  But it's difficult.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Want my interest back in the show?   Ramp up the conflict.  Here some changes I'd consider.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have this be one of the movies where the  movie was much better than the book, and have Duchovny's character unable to write because he's come face to face with the fact that he couldn't honor his idea as well as the movie-makers.  It's shattered the ego he needed to make it as a novelist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have Duchovny's character desperate to get back to New York, where he can recapture the "good old days", and ignore the ego smashing that the mere fact of residing in the city that is now the living embodiment of his lost confidence.  Of course, however, he can't go because his daughter's here.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Can't believe that all these beautiful women are falling in bed with Duchovny left and right?   Maybe they're not.  He could be delusional and it's a lie.   The first scene turned out to be a dream sequence, so there's some precedent for rewriting his sexual experiences.  Write it up so his "conquests" are, at least in large part, stories he's telling his LA friends to keep up his feelings of self-worth.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Give the guy some financial woes.  One novel and one movie option rarely put anyone on easy street.  Have this eat at him too.   Duchovny sold out his book for the cash, thinking he'd be able to say "Man, look how the ruined it.  At least I got paid."  And now, since the movie's great, he's concerned he was the hack AND he didn't get paid enough.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Add all that together and we have a  writer with a bundle of neurosis that don't seem bought at the character warehouse.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don't have much to say about his ex, because she was pretty underdeveloped.  It's only the first episode, so I'll let that slide. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Same thing with the daughter, her character seemed a plot point more than anything else so far, so I don't have much to say about her either.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-same old Anonymous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no plans on watching this show, but the fact that you did a breakdown on it,  and that Denis over at Dead Things on Sticks said it was good, convinced me to give it a shot.   I wish I hadn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>The show seemed wish fulfillment writ large to me.  The writer peeved about a movie adaptation; been there.  Beautiful women throwing themselves at him; seen that.  A single novel (apparently) having made a fellow rich, respected, and loved; imagined that in my darker moments.  Oh, the novelist is a tough guy and beats up &#8220;hispanic cell phone guy&#8221; in a theater too; be still my Chuck Norris loving heart.</p>
<p>All taken together I&#8217;m left with the impression I&#8217;m reading some weird variety of Salman Rushdie fan fic.</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s only a half hour set up I&#8217;m trying to hold some goodwill for the show in reserve.  But it&#8217;s difficult.</p>
<p>Want my interest back in the show?   Ramp up the conflict.  Here some changes I&#8217;d consider.  </p>
<p>Have this be one of the movies where the  movie was much better than the book, and have Duchovny&#8217;s character unable to write because he&#8217;s come face to face with the fact that he couldn&#8217;t honor his idea as well as the movie-makers.  It&#8217;s shattered the ego he needed to make it as a novelist.</p>
<p>Have Duchovny&#8217;s character desperate to get back to New York, where he can recapture the &#8220;good old days&#8221;, and ignore the ego smashing that the mere fact of residing in the city that is now the living embodiment of his lost confidence.  Of course, however, he can&#8217;t go because his daughter&#8217;s here.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t believe that all these beautiful women are falling in bed with Duchovny left and right?   Maybe they&#8217;re not.  He could be delusional and it&#8217;s a lie.   The first scene turned out to be a dream sequence, so there&#8217;s some precedent for rewriting his sexual experiences.  Write it up so his &#8220;conquests&#8221; are, at least in large part, stories he&#8217;s telling his LA friends to keep up his feelings of self-worth.</p>
<p>Give the guy some financial woes.  One novel and one movie option rarely put anyone on easy street.  Have this eat at him too.   Duchovny sold out his book for the cash, thinking he&#8217;d be able to say &#8220;Man, look how the ruined it.  At least I got paid.&#8221;  And now, since the movie&#8217;s great, he&#8217;s concerned he was the hack AND he didn&#8217;t get paid enough.</p>
<p>Add all that together and we have a  writer with a bundle of neurosis that don&#8217;t seem bought at the character warehouse.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have much to say about his ex, because she was pretty underdeveloped.  It&#8217;s only the first episode, so I&#8217;ll let that slide. </p>
<p>Same thing with the daughter, her character seemed a plot point more than anything else so far, so I don&#8217;t have much to say about her either.</p>
<p>-same old Anonymous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-51</link>
		<author>Bill Cunningham</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I have to give this series a shot, just from the amount of "controversy" it seems to have stirred up in the scribosphere. Some people like it, some hate it, and others don't know what to make of it (or combinations of the above). A recommendation if ever I heard one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to give this series a shot, just from the amount of &#8220;controversy&#8221; it seems to have stirred up in the scribosphere. Some people like it, some hate it, and others don&#8217;t know what to make of it (or combinations of the above). A recommendation if ever I heard one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Golick</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-50</link>
		<author>Jill Golick</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Yes. I will correct that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I will correct that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Delfin</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-49</link>
		<author>Jon Delfin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/08/californication/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Or even, "You have *bad* taste in movies." "Paid taste" is an interesting alternative, I grant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or even, &#8220;You have *bad* taste in movies.&#8221; &#8220;Paid taste&#8221; is an interesting alternative, I grant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
