<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And So Begins Another Season of Television</title>
	<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on television writing for screenwriters</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-118</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I didn't watch it on Global.  I saw it a couple of weeks ago on the NBC site.  The streaming was pretty slow and I didn't notice those shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t watch it on Global.  I saw it a couple of weeks ago on the NBC site.  The streaming was pretty slow and I didn&#8217;t notice those shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-117</link>
		<author>p mitchell</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Hey, do you know if Global screwed up the broadcast of the first ep of the season this year, I've been trying to get an answer out of them.  It seemed to me that although FNL has had some radicial framing in the past the ep I saw was way out there -- full shots of sky with just a wisp of hair to suggest the presense of a human -- two shots that were composed of a full frame of emptiness with just one actor's nose in the frame.

It seems likely that the FNL team is not trying to allienate the audience so did global broadcast the wrong master (the true HD version) instead of the faux HD finish most shows use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, do you know if Global screwed up the broadcast of the first ep of the season this year, I&#8217;ve been trying to get an answer out of them.  It seemed to me that although FNL has had some radicial framing in the past the ep I saw was way out there &#8212; full shots of sky with just a wisp of hair to suggest the presense of a human &#8212; two shots that were composed of a full frame of emptiness with just one actor&#8217;s nose in the frame.</p>
<p>It seems likely that the FNL team is not trying to allienate the audience so did global broadcast the wrong master (the true HD version) instead of the faux HD finish most shows use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-116</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I agree, Mad Men qualifies, but since it premiered in the summer I didn't count it.  We were already addicted before the fall season launched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Mad Men qualifies, but since it premiered in the summer I didn&#8217;t count it.  We were already addicted before the fall season launched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elver</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-115</link>
		<author>Elver</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2007/10/and-so-begins-another-season-of-television/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;"No slam-dunk must-see show has emerged."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How about Mad Men? I think it qualifies.

P.S: I love the theme of your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;No slam-dunk must-see show has emerged.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>How about Mad Men? I think it qualifies.</p>
<p>P.S: I love the theme of your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
