<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: quarterlife</title>
	<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on television writing for screenwriters</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-622</link>
		<author>Stephen</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-622</guid>
		<description>For what it's worth - I'm from the generation that loved thirtysomething because it was so accurate.  That makes me a little old for quarterlife's demographics.

That aside, I found the acting stilted, many characters mailing in their lines without much emotion, and the plot was so well hidden that it escaped the writing staff.  If anything is going anywhere, they aren't letting the audience in on the secret.  

And... I would have assumed a webpage somewhere, maybe even a mySpace existence, but nobody told me about it for the time I could stomach watching the show.  

Honestly, it was surprising how little show seemed to care about anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth - I&#8217;m from the generation that loved thirtysomething because it was so accurate.  That makes me a little old for quarterlife&#8217;s demographics.</p>
<p>That aside, I found the acting stilted, many characters mailing in their lines without much emotion, and the plot was so well hidden that it escaped the writing staff.  If anything is going anywhere, they aren&#8217;t letting the audience in on the secret.  </p>
<p>And&#8230; I would have assumed a webpage somewhere, maybe even a mySpace existence, but nobody told me about it for the time I could stomach watching the show.  </p>
<p>Honestly, it was surprising how little show seemed to care about anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-572</link>
		<author>Cunningham</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-572</guid>
		<description>As I was watching last night, I kept yelling at the screen," Would you like some cheese to go with that whine?" 

And then, lo and behold, after the 2nd act the cheese showed up all on its own...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was watching last night, I kept yelling at the screen,&#8221; Would you like some cheese to go with that whine?&#8221; </p>
<p>And then, lo and behold, after the 2nd act the cheese showed up all on its own&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-571</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>I explored the quarterlife site yesterday for the first time in months and one thing that struck me was that it was not well used.  For example, Dylan -- the lead character in the series -- only has about 300 odd friends.  She doesn't have thousands of comments.  That really surprised me and suggested to me that they haven't been promoing the social networking aspects of the series.  I'd be interested in knowing how many people are watching the show online.  Is it a big hit?  Most of the press I've read about have highlighted the tv-web and back to tv side of the story.  I haven't read anything about viewers being totally addicted to the series or a huge audience.  I sure would like to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I explored the quarterlife site yesterday for the first time in months and one thing that struck me was that it was not well used.  For example, Dylan &#8212; the lead character in the series &#8212; only has about 300 odd friends.  She doesn&#8217;t have thousands of comments.  That really surprised me and suggested to me that they haven&#8217;t been promoing the social networking aspects of the series.  I&#8217;d be interested in knowing how many people are watching the show online.  Is it a big hit?  Most of the press I&#8217;ve read about have highlighted the tv-web and back to tv side of the story.  I haven&#8217;t read anything about viewers being totally addicted to the series or a huge audience.  I sure would like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbo</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-569</link>
		<author>Robbo</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-569</guid>
		<description>I don't know about kudzu but I have to agree with the noted similarities to "Thirty Something".  I caught "Quarterlife" last night too and my immediate reaction was:  "Ahhh, as these guys get older their trying to swim upstream to the shores of the younger demographic."  That can be kinda sad, in a way.

I'm eager to see how the online component plays out both in and of itself, in relation to the broadcast component and, ultimately, in how either side feeds (or impedes) the other.

At first blush the characters are the usual quirky mix that attempt to cross a range of types and thereby attract a wider cross-section of the desired audience.  How closely these characters - and what obsesses them - hew to their "target" I don't really know.  I'm a curmudgeonly 50 year old who has to concentrate when watching shows like this so as not to have his perceptions tainted with envy at the young - regardless of how facile their lives may seem.

Shows like this have, traditionally, "grown" as opposed to bursting on the scene as a complete audience phenomenon.  They require time (an increasingly limited resource, it seems) to develop with their audience and find the richness of the characters and bond with the viewers.  Perhaps the online aspects of this narrative will help speed up this process or dig a little deeper into the consciousness of the crowd.  I don't know.

I do know we can expect to see more and more of these kinds of "diary entry" narratives, where the self-expressive technologies that are increasingly pervasive in our day-to-day communicative lives get reflected (finally) in the dramatic discourse that passes for entertainment.  Having it reflected within one format is one thing - seeing it broken apart and spread across formats, to truly use the "web" of communication we are clambering through (or caught up in), will be a true reflection of where we are as a culture.

In the meantime, I'm content to sit in the kudzu and watch it grow - before deciding to either water it or cut it down.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about kudzu but I have to agree with the noted similarities to &#8220;Thirty Something&#8221;.  I caught &#8220;Quarterlife&#8221; last night too and my immediate reaction was:  &#8220;Ahhh, as these guys get older their trying to swim upstream to the shores of the younger demographic.&#8221;  That can be kinda sad, in a way.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m eager to see how the online component plays out both in and of itself, in relation to the broadcast component and, ultimately, in how either side feeds (or impedes) the other.</p>
<p>At first blush the characters are the usual quirky mix that attempt to cross a range of types and thereby attract a wider cross-section of the desired audience.  How closely these characters - and what obsesses them - hew to their &#8220;target&#8221; I don&#8217;t really know.  I&#8217;m a curmudgeonly 50 year old who has to concentrate when watching shows like this so as not to have his perceptions tainted with envy at the young - regardless of how facile their lives may seem.</p>
<p>Shows like this have, traditionally, &#8220;grown&#8221; as opposed to bursting on the scene as a complete audience phenomenon.  They require time (an increasingly limited resource, it seems) to develop with their audience and find the richness of the characters and bond with the viewers.  Perhaps the online aspects of this narrative will help speed up this process or dig a little deeper into the consciousness of the crowd.  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>I do know we can expect to see more and more of these kinds of &#8220;diary entry&#8221; narratives, where the self-expressive technologies that are increasingly pervasive in our day-to-day communicative lives get reflected (finally) in the dramatic discourse that passes for entertainment.  Having it reflected within one format is one thing - seeing it broken apart and spread across formats, to truly use the &#8220;web&#8221; of communication we are clambering through (or caught up in), will be a true reflection of where we are as a culture.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;m content to sit in the kudzu and watch it grow - before deciding to either water it or cut it down.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-568</link>
		<author>Cunningham</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jillgolick.com/2008/02/quarterlife/#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Saw it last night. This is "Twentysomething" and I really hated it when it was "Thirtysomething." It has diminished with age...

Zwick and Herskovitz are mining the same territory they always have, and I have to say the soil is all played out. Nothing can grow there except kudzu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw it last night. This is &#8220;Twentysomething&#8221; and I really hated it when it was &#8220;Thirtysomething.&#8221; It has diminished with age&#8230;</p>
<p>Zwick and Herskovitz are mining the same territory they always have, and I have to say the soil is all played out. Nothing can grow there except kudzu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
